Bad News for Blackboard, Good News for Moodle

The American Association of Community College’s Instructional Technology Council (ITC) has just published its 2007 Distance Education Survey Results, covering data from 154 U.S. community colleges. And there’s a lot of interesting stuff in it. Here are the headlines that I drew from it:

  • Distance education continues to grow at a very healthy clip, particularly in this market segment.
  • Blackboard is losing market share rapidly
  • Moodle doubled it’s market share in the past 12 months and now has the highest market share after Blackboard/WebCT in this market segment.
  • ANGEL and D2L also grew their market share.
  • We have reason to expect more LMS churn in the near future, which is bad for Blackboard.
  • The top 5 areas of likely distance learning-related service growth in this segment are (1) online student organization web site and services, (2) online counseling and advising, (3) online plagiarism evaluation, (4) audio/video streaming, and (5) online textbook sales.

As you can imagine, the LMS market share stuff is what interests me the most at the moment.

To begin with, it’s clear that community colleges represent a really important growth area for distance learning and, by extension, to LMS vendors. Survey respondants reported an 18% year-over-year growth in distance education courses, in contrast to the 9.7% growth rate that Sloan-C found in it’s broader cross-section of universities and the 2% growth in on-campus enrollments for the same year. That’s pretty impressive. Which is why it must be particularly worrying to Blackboard to read this paragraph in the report’s “Observations and Trends” section:

It seems that the recent merger of Blackboard-WebCt in February 2006 and a substantial increase in fees may have prompted a growing number of colleges to review their learning management system (LMS) commitments. Thirty-one percent of the respondents indicated they were considering switching from their current LMS. Although licensed LMS solutions prevail, Moodle, an open-source solution, reflected a doubling of its share in one year.

Blackboard lost 7% market share in this segment over the past year. Even worse for them, it looks like this trend is accelerating. Note that EDUCAUSE reported in 2005 (with a somewhat different survey population) that only 13% of surveyed institutions were considering changing their LMS in the next 3 years. If the two survey populations are behaving similarly, then the number of institutions that are shopping around has more than doubled since then. Under these circumstances, Blackboard could easily lose 20% market share over the next 3 years.

The degree to which this will impact their bottom line and stock price are complex questions. First of all, a lot will depend on how many Blackboard Enterprise customers they lose. Keep in mind that Blackboard has already lost close to a third of their “Basic” license customers in 2006 and 2007 (where the “Basic” category also includes WebCT Vista and CE) and they still performed pretty close to their guidance to Wall Street during that time. In order to keep this feat up, they need to grow their number of lucrative Enterprise license customers even as their total number of LMS customers shrinks. We’re in LMS buying season right now; watch to see how many Blackboard Enterprise customers announce that they’re leaving for other platforms versus how many new Enterprise wins they get. Blackboard is also trying to sell more stuff to the customers they already have. Notice that they’ve been on a bit of an acquisition spree lately, buying up everything from content management to emergency warning systems to video surveillence systems. They’re trying to diversify their way out of this problem. Still, even if Blackboard manages to continue its financial levitation act for the next few years, part of its stock valuation is based on the assumption that the company has a near-monopoly with all that implies. If it loses 20% market share then it will almost certainly lose market value regardless of its revenues because the “multiplier” that Wall Street applies will go down.

OK, but if Blackboard is the loser in this report, then who are the winners? Clearly, Moodle is a winner, having gone from less than 4% market share to more than 10% (in this segment) in a year’s time. Moodle is now the only non-Blackboard LMS with a double-digit market share in this segment. I have to wonder how much of that growth is due to one support vendor. From what I’ve been hearing, Moodlerooms has been tearing up the U.S. market with very aggressive pricing and good support plans. I have a feeling that a big portion of the shift in overall market share is WebCT CE customers going to Moodlerooms.

Another clear winner this year is ANGEL, which went from 5% to more than 9% market share. In this case, I have to wonder how much of this increase is due to SUNY. The SUNY Learning Network, which supports a couple of dozen community colleges in the SUNY system, is well along in the process of migrating from a home-grown LMS to ANGEL. If there was strong SUNY participation in this survey then a good chunk of ANGEL’s upswing could be attributable to them. Which just goes to show you how important these big system-wide wins can be for a platform. D2L also gained a bit more than 2% market share, while the rest were flat or slightly down.

There’s a lot more in this report–stuff about services, faculty- and student-reported needs, and other important topics. I highly recommend reading the whole thing.

Share Button

Google+ Comments

About Michael Feldstein

Michael Feldstein is co-Publisher of e-Literate, co-Producer of e-Literate TV, and Partner in MindWires Consulting. For more information, see his profile page.
This entry was posted in Ed Tech, LMS & Learning Platforms and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Bad News for Blackboard, Good News for Moodle

  1. Michael Korcuska says:

    Good post, Michael. It is worth mentioning that Etudes is a customized version of Sakai. Etudes is the consortium of more than 20 community colleges in California, led by Vivie Sinou’s team at Foothill College.

  2. Vivie Sinou says:

    I wonder if their data is as inaccurate across the report as they are in their comments about us:

    “…while Etudes and Sakai were down slightly.”

    I can’t speak for Sakai, but I don’t know where they got their information about ETUDES. We had 100% renewals in our contracts from our consortium schools last year. Additionally, we got a new member (El Camino College dropped Bb for ETUDES) and Mira Costa College joined us for a pilot. 100% renewals are expected for 2008-09, as per responses from all my ETUDES Consortium Distance Learning contacts.

    The truth is that we have been in heads-down mode in the last 17 months with aggressive development of Mneme – Test Center and massive migration of users over from our legacy system and Blackboard, and we did not focus on growth at all, but we didn’t lose any members either.

    Having said that, their statement above is insignificant. We are very small in this space at the moment. I just wanted to set the record straight….

  3. Lisa Neal says:

    This is a great report and thanks for pointing it out. I’m curious about, and wonder if you have insights, about the differences between the administrators who make the decisions, the people who are impacted in terms of the design and capabilities (faculty), and the end users (students). Also, what do you think of tech populism and the differences and discrepancies between the tools students are given and what they use for their non-academic lives?

  4. Steven says:

    Ah the brilliance of a publicly traded company. Their renewal rate has not sunk so how have they lost marketshare?

  5. Steven, you ask a very interesting question–one that I’d like to see put to Blackboard’s executive leadership. By both independent measures (like this survey, which covers one particular market segment) and Blackboard’s own reported figures of total numbers of Basic and Enterprise customers, they are losing LMS licensing customers at a rapid pace. So when Bb talks about their “renewal rate,” what, exactly, is being renewed? And by whom?

  6. Pingback: E-learning links :

  7. Mickey Slimp says:

    Related to Vivie’s comments about ETUDES usage increasing, there is no reason to doubt that is right. Note that the survey was of AACC members as opposed to ETUDES Consortium Members so that the data would only apply to trends at the member Community Colleges. That’s a caveat that would apply with all of the findings.

    To get a copy of the complete survey contact ITC at [email protected].

  8. Patrick says:

    Blackboard is diversifying because it has to! Web 2.0 is taking over elearning. There is going to be a lot of shifting around going on. Mainly to open source and free systems. The real question is which system can actually generate revenue for the college. That’s what they need.

  9. Pingback: Re. Blackboard Customers Consider Alternatives | Flexknowlogy - Jared Stein on Education and Technology

  10. Pingback: Blackboard’s Market Share Erosion

  11. Pingback: Bad News for Blackboard, Good News for Moodle :: Patrick Malley

  12. Pingback: Bad News for Blackboard, Good News for ANGEL

  13. Because of all the new reqirements of NCOEMS and changes in the EMS Education field. We have just started our online training with moodle hosted by Site Ground. Total cost for a year of hosting $20 dollars and Moodle is free. We are very please and have almost 200 students. I love the way you can put streaming video directly into moodle. I have used Blackboard as a student and Instructor.

  14. Aadesh says:

    We are very happy with service given by very awesome work is done by them.

Comments are closed.