<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackboard Patents the LMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/</link>
	<description>What Michael Feldstein Is Learning About Online Learning...Online</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Florida Free Culture &#187; Blackboard patents close to being revoked</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-57652</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida Free Culture &#187; Blackboard patents close to being revoked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-57652</guid>
		<description>[...] The patents granted were widely criticized as being too trivial and too broad, allowing Blackboard to sue basically any competitor of learning management systems. Blackboard&#8217;s is the “Learning System” used by the University of Florida. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The patents granted were widely criticized as being too trivial and too broad, allowing Blackboard to sue basically any competitor of learning management systems. Blackboard&#8217;s is the “Learning System” used by the University of Florida. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O Blog do Gustavo Felisberto &#187; It is not new, but you can laugh anyway</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-4190</link>
		<dc:creator>O Blog do Gustavo Felisberto &#187; It is not new, but you can laugh anyway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 13:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-4190</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems that Blackboard has patented LMS (Learning Management System) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems that Blackboard has patented LMS (Learning Management System) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AR</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-4050</link>
		<dc:creator>AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-4050</guid>
		<description>My great great great great great great great great great great grandmother introduced the use of slate into classrooms 300 years ago as  the medium for pupil writing.  They would use rags to wipe the surface clean.  Blackboard as both type and token is a derivative idea, and the current company known by that name claims to have invented the idea of LMS. Well the actual truth of the matter is that my grandmother introduced the idea, of managing learning on visual real estate.  I  HEREBY proclaim the now obvious idea OPEN SOURCE in perpetuity on this and any other planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My great great great great great great great great great great grandmother introduced the use of slate into classrooms 300 years ago as  the medium for pupil writing.  They would use rags to wipe the surface clean.  Blackboard as both type and token is a derivative idea, and the current company known by that name claims to have invented the idea of LMS. Well the actual truth of the matter is that my grandmother introduced the idea, of managing learning on visual real estate.  I  HEREBY proclaim the now obvious idea OPEN SOURCE in perpetuity on this and any other planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AR</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-3236</guid>
		<description>The Blackboard lawsuit filed in Texas is patently absurd, but clearly evidence they
see their end is in sight.  The migration to second life has begun, and the best venues and platforms there will all be open source.
Whey they are thrown out of court in  Texas they should just curl up and fade away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Blackboard lawsuit filed in Texas is patently absurd, but clearly evidence they<br />
see their end is in sight.  The migration to second life has begun, and the best venues and platforms there will all be open source.<br />
Whey they are thrown out of court in  Texas they should just curl up and fade away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbhj</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>pbhj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Two little points:

1) Patent monopolies are defined by the claims, the "statement of invention" doesn't mean a thing.

2) USPTO publications aren't all granted patents they also publish applications (called A-documents in Europe) that haven't a snowball in hells chance of being granted. One such application in the UK did try to claim a monopoly on arabic numerals, lol, so Harold who mentioned zero was not too far off the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two little points:</p>
<p>1) Patent monopolies are defined by the claims, the &#8220;statement of invention&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean a thing.</p>
<p>2) USPTO publications aren&#8217;t all granted patents they also publish applications (called A-documents in Europe) that haven&#8217;t a snowball in hells chance of being granted. One such application in the UK did try to claim a monopoly on arabic numerals, lol, so Harold who mentioned zero was not too far off the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodeo</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Screw this. I'm going to patent flatulence and get rich selling beans and suing my customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw this. I&#8217;m going to patent flatulence and get rich selling beans and suing my customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j2xs</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>j2xs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Hey everyone;

In a court of law, it's ONLY the claims that matter. The rest of the patent is almost irrelevant in a court (not a lawyer but my understanding).

I think if the community reads the claims (yes, can be mind boggling at times) and still decides it's a load of #@%&#38;$, then other readers will have a better sense of what's about to happen next in the LMS saga...

I think (again, not lawyer) the way you read this is claims 1 thru 35 make up one "thing" that the patent holder says cannot be replicated without someone licensing it from the patent holder. 

Then, from 36 on is another "thing" that is separate and cannot be replicated without license.

Here's where I need help, but I think if you infringe on only one little piece of #1 thru #35, it's okay. This is because the patent is trying to protect the entire _system_ described by all the claims 1-35 and not each claim on its own.

Like I said 1000 times...not lawyer but this is what I've come to think is true in the normal course of my tech biz career.

Here are the claims:

1. A course-based system for providing to an educational community of users access to a plurality of online courses, comprising:
 
a) a plurality of user computers, with each user computer being associated with a user of the system and with each user being capable of having predefined characteristics indicative of multiple predetermined roles in the system, each role providing a level of access to a plurality of data files associated with a particular course and a level of control over the data files associated with the course with the multiple predetermined user roles comprising at least two user's predetermined roles selected from the group consisting of a student role in one or more course associated with a student user, an instructor role in one or more courses associated with an instructor user and an administrator role associated with an administrator user, and 

b) a server computer in communication with each of the user computers over a network, the server computer comprising: means for storing a plurality of data files associated with a course, means for assigning a level of access to and control of each data file based on a user of the system's predetermined role in a course; means for determining whether access to a data file associated with the course is authorized; means for allowing access to and control of the data file associated with the course if authorization is granted based on the access level of the user of the system.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the instructor user is provided with an access level to enable the creation and editing of a plurality of files associated with a course.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise an announcement file.

4. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a course information file.

5. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a staff information file posted to all registered in the course.

6. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a course document file posted to all registered in the course.

7. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise an assignments file posted to all registered in the course.

8. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a dropbox file.

9. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise an asynchronous communication file.

10. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a synchronous communication file.

11. The system of claim 2 wherein the student user is provided with an access level to enable reading of a plurality of files associated with a course.

12. The system of claim 11 wherein the student user is provided with an access level to enable modification of a subset of the plurality of files associated with a course.

13. The system of claim 11 wherein the user is provided with an access level to enable creation of a student file associated with a file for which the student user is able to read.

14. The system of claim 13 in which the file that the student is able to read is an assessment file created by the instructor user, and the student file created by the student user is a response to the assessment file.

15. The system of claim 14 wherein the assessment file comprises a plurality of examination questions selected by the instructor user to assess the ability of the student user.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the examination questions are selected by the instructor user from a predetermined pool of available examination questions.

17. The system of claim 15 wherein the examination questions are created by the instructor user substantially at the time of the creation of the assessment file.

18. The system of claim 15 wherein the student file is reviewed by the instructor user and assigned a grade.

19. The system of claim 18 wherein the grade is made available to the student user.

20. The system of claim 18 wherein the instructor user collates a plurality of grades obtained from reviewing a plurality of student files, and wherein the collated grades are made available to all student users associated with the course.

21. The system of claim 13 in which the file that the student is able to read is an assignment file created by the instructor user, and the student file created by the student user is a response to the assignment file.

22. The system of claim 8 wherein the dropbox file comprises a plurality of files transferred to the server computer from one or more student users associated with the course.

23. The system of claim 22 wherein the instructor user is provided with access to the files in the dropbox file, whereby the instructor user may download, edit and upload the files in the dropbox.

24. The system of claim 1 wherein a user is required to enter a login sequence into a user computer in order to be provided with access to course files associated with that user.

25. The system of claim 24 wherein the user is provided with access to all courses with which the user is associated after entry of the logon sequence.

26. The system of claim 25 wherein the user is provided with a web page comprising a plurality of course hyperlinks, each of said course hyperlinks associated with each course that the user has enrolled in.

27. The system of claim 26 wherein selection of a course hyperlink will provide the user with a web page associated with the selected course, the web page comprising a plurality of content hyperlinks to various content areas associated with the course.

28. The system of claim 27 wherein said content hyperlinks comprise an announcement area hyperlink, a course information hyperlink, a staff information hyperlink, a course documents hyperlink, an assignments hyperlink, a communications hyperlink, and a student tools hyperlink.

29. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the announcement area hyperlink provides a web page comprising a group of course announcements.

30. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the course information hyperlink provides a web page comprising information regarding the associated course.

31. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the staff information hyperlink provides a web page comprising data regarding the instructors of the associated course.

32. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the course documents hyperlink provides a web page comprising a listing of documents associated with the course.

33. The system of claim 32 wherein the listing of course documents comprise active hyperlinks to the documents.

34. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the assignments hyperlink provides a web page comprising a group of course assignments.

35. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the communications hyperlink provides a web page comprising hyperlinks to a group of communication tools comprising an asynchronous communication tool and a synchronous communication tool.

36. An method for providing online education method for a community of users in a network based system comprising the steps of: a. establishing that each user is capable of having redefined characteristics indicative of multiple predetermined roles in the system and each role providing a level of access to and control of a plurality of course files; b. establishing a course to be offered online, comprising i. generating a set of course files for use with teaching a course; ii. transferring the course files to a server computer for storage; and iii. allowing access to and control of the course files according to the established roles for the users according to step (a); c. providing a predetermined level of access and control over the network to the course files to users with an established role as a student user enrolled in the course; and d. providing a predetermined level of access and control over the network to the course files to users with an established role other than a student user enrolled in the course.

37. The method of claim 36 wherein at least one of the course files comprises a course assignment, further comprising the steps of: e) the student user creating a student file in response to the course assignment; and f) the student user transferring the student file to the server computer.

38. The method of claim 37 further comprising the steps of: g) the instructor user accessing the student file from the server computer; h) the instructor user reviewing the student file to determine compliance with the course assignment; and i) the instructor user assigning a grade to the student file as a function of the determination of compliance with the course assignment.

39. The method of claim 38 further comprising the step of the instructor user posting the grade to a file on the server computer accessible only to the student user with which the grade is associated.

40. The method of claim 38 further comprising the steps of the instructor repeating the steps (g), (h), and (i) for a plurality of student users that are enrolled in the course.

41. The method of claim 40 further comprising the step of the instructor user performing a statistical analysis on the grades assigned to the plurality of student users.

42. The method of claim 41 further comprising the step of making results of the statistical analysis available to the student users enrolled in the course.

43. The method of claim 36 further comprising the step of providing an asynchronous communication tool accessible to student users enrolled in the course for enabling asynchronous communication amongst the student users.

44. The method of claim 36 further comprising the step of providing a synchronous communication tool accessible to student users enrolled in the course for enabling synchronous communication amongst the student users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone;</p>
<p>In a court of law, it&#8217;s ONLY the claims that matter. The rest of the patent is almost irrelevant in a court (not a lawyer but my understanding).</p>
<p>I think if the community reads the claims (yes, can be mind boggling at times) and still decides it&#8217;s a load of #@%&amp;$, then other readers will have a better sense of what&#8217;s about to happen next in the LMS saga&#8230;</p>
<p>I think (again, not lawyer) the way you read this is claims 1 thru 35 make up one &#8220;thing&#8221; that the patent holder says cannot be replicated without someone licensing it from the patent holder. </p>
<p>Then, from 36 on is another &#8220;thing&#8221; that is separate and cannot be replicated without license.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where I need help, but I think if you infringe on only one little piece of #1 thru #35, it&#8217;s okay. This is because the patent is trying to protect the entire _system_ described by all the claims 1-35 and not each claim on its own.</p>
<p>Like I said 1000 times&#8230;not lawyer but this is what I&#8217;ve come to think is true in the normal course of my tech biz career.</p>
<p>Here are the claims:</p>
<p>1. A course-based system for providing to an educational community of users access to a plurality of online courses, comprising:</p>
<p>a) a plurality of user computers, with each user computer being associated with a user of the system and with each user being capable of having predefined characteristics indicative of multiple predetermined roles in the system, each role providing a level of access to a plurality of data files associated with a particular course and a level of control over the data files associated with the course with the multiple predetermined user roles comprising at least two user&#8217;s predetermined roles selected from the group consisting of a student role in one or more course associated with a student user, an instructor role in one or more courses associated with an instructor user and an administrator role associated with an administrator user, and </p>
<p>b) a server computer in communication with each of the user computers over a network, the server computer comprising: means for storing a plurality of data files associated with a course, means for assigning a level of access to and control of each data file based on a user of the system&#8217;s predetermined role in a course; means for determining whether access to a data file associated with the course is authorized; means for allowing access to and control of the data file associated with the course if authorization is granted based on the access level of the user of the system.</p>
<p>2. The system of claim 1 wherein the instructor user is provided with an access level to enable the creation and editing of a plurality of files associated with a course.</p>
<p>3. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise an announcement file.</p>
<p>4. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a course information file.</p>
<p>5. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a staff information file posted to all registered in the course.</p>
<p>6. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a course document file posted to all registered in the course.</p>
<p>7. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise an assignments file posted to all registered in the course.</p>
<p>8. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a dropbox file.</p>
<p>9. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise an asynchronous communication file.</p>
<p>10. The system of claim 2 wherein the course files comprise a synchronous communication file.</p>
<p>11. The system of claim 2 wherein the student user is provided with an access level to enable reading of a plurality of files associated with a course.</p>
<p>12. The system of claim 11 wherein the student user is provided with an access level to enable modification of a subset of the plurality of files associated with a course.</p>
<p>13. The system of claim 11 wherein the user is provided with an access level to enable creation of a student file associated with a file for which the student user is able to read.</p>
<p>14. The system of claim 13 in which the file that the student is able to read is an assessment file created by the instructor user, and the student file created by the student user is a response to the assessment file.</p>
<p>15. The system of claim 14 wherein the assessment file comprises a plurality of examination questions selected by the instructor user to assess the ability of the student user.</p>
<p>16. The system of claim 15 wherein the examination questions are selected by the instructor user from a predetermined pool of available examination questions.</p>
<p>17. The system of claim 15 wherein the examination questions are created by the instructor user substantially at the time of the creation of the assessment file.</p>
<p>18. The system of claim 15 wherein the student file is reviewed by the instructor user and assigned a grade.</p>
<p>19. The system of claim 18 wherein the grade is made available to the student user.</p>
<p>20. The system of claim 18 wherein the instructor user collates a plurality of grades obtained from reviewing a plurality of student files, and wherein the collated grades are made available to all student users associated with the course.</p>
<p>21. The system of claim 13 in which the file that the student is able to read is an assignment file created by the instructor user, and the student file created by the student user is a response to the assignment file.</p>
<p>22. The system of claim 8 wherein the dropbox file comprises a plurality of files transferred to the server computer from one or more student users associated with the course.</p>
<p>23. The system of claim 22 wherein the instructor user is provided with access to the files in the dropbox file, whereby the instructor user may download, edit and upload the files in the dropbox.</p>
<p>24. The system of claim 1 wherein a user is required to enter a login sequence into a user computer in order to be provided with access to course files associated with that user.</p>
<p>25. The system of claim 24 wherein the user is provided with access to all courses with which the user is associated after entry of the logon sequence.</p>
<p>26. The system of claim 25 wherein the user is provided with a web page comprising a plurality of course hyperlinks, each of said course hyperlinks associated with each course that the user has enrolled in.</p>
<p>27. The system of claim 26 wherein selection of a course hyperlink will provide the user with a web page associated with the selected course, the web page comprising a plurality of content hyperlinks to various content areas associated with the course.</p>
<p>28. The system of claim 27 wherein said content hyperlinks comprise an announcement area hyperlink, a course information hyperlink, a staff information hyperlink, a course documents hyperlink, an assignments hyperlink, a communications hyperlink, and a student tools hyperlink.</p>
<p>29. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the announcement area hyperlink provides a web page comprising a group of course announcements.</p>
<p>30. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the course information hyperlink provides a web page comprising information regarding the associated course.</p>
<p>31. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the staff information hyperlink provides a web page comprising data regarding the instructors of the associated course.</p>
<p>32. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the course documents hyperlink provides a web page comprising a listing of documents associated with the course.</p>
<p>33. The system of claim 32 wherein the listing of course documents comprise active hyperlinks to the documents.</p>
<p>34. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the assignments hyperlink provides a web page comprising a group of course assignments.</p>
<p>35. The system of claim 28 wherein selection of the communications hyperlink provides a web page comprising hyperlinks to a group of communication tools comprising an asynchronous communication tool and a synchronous communication tool.</p>
<p>36. An method for providing online education method for a community of users in a network based system comprising the steps of: a. establishing that each user is capable of having redefined characteristics indicative of multiple predetermined roles in the system and each role providing a level of access to and control of a plurality of course files; b. establishing a course to be offered online, comprising i. generating a set of course files for use with teaching a course; ii. transferring the course files to a server computer for storage; and iii. allowing access to and control of the course files according to the established roles for the users according to step (a); c. providing a predetermined level of access and control over the network to the course files to users with an established role as a student user enrolled in the course; and d. providing a predetermined level of access and control over the network to the course files to users with an established role other than a student user enrolled in the course.</p>
<p>37. The method of claim 36 wherein at least one of the course files comprises a course assignment, further comprising the steps of: e) the student user creating a student file in response to the course assignment; and f) the student user transferring the student file to the server computer.</p>
<p>38. The method of claim 37 further comprising the steps of: g) the instructor user accessing the student file from the server computer; h) the instructor user reviewing the student file to determine compliance with the course assignment; and i) the instructor user assigning a grade to the student file as a function of the determination of compliance with the course assignment.</p>
<p>39. The method of claim 38 further comprising the step of the instructor user posting the grade to a file on the server computer accessible only to the student user with which the grade is associated.</p>
<p>40. The method of claim 38 further comprising the steps of the instructor repeating the steps (g), (h), and (i) for a plurality of student users that are enrolled in the course.</p>
<p>41. The method of claim 40 further comprising the step of the instructor user performing a statistical analysis on the grades assigned to the plurality of student users.</p>
<p>42. The method of claim 41 further comprising the step of making results of the statistical analysis available to the student users enrolled in the course.</p>
<p>43. The method of claim 36 further comprising the step of providing an asynchronous communication tool accessible to student users enrolled in the course for enabling asynchronous communication amongst the student users.</p>
<p>44. The method of claim 36 further comprising the step of providing a synchronous communication tool accessible to student users enrolled in the course for enabling synchronous communication amongst the student users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J C Fleet</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>J C Fleet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Don't worry all to much about the educational environment.
They will be WAY to busy for some time lining up at the doors of very deep pocketed corporations to get their royalties for such tools as...

...how to sell your old junk online.
...how to turn on your computer.
...how to setup your server.
...how to write code with our development platform.
...how to withdraw money from our ATM.
...how to utilize our ERP system.
...you get the idea.

Let's hope none of the behemoths gets the bright idea of supporting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry all to much about the educational environment.<br />
They will be WAY to busy for some time lining up at the doors of very deep pocketed corporations to get their royalties for such tools as&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;how to sell your old junk online.<br />
&#8230;how to turn on your computer.<br />
&#8230;how to setup your server.<br />
&#8230;how to write code with our development platform.<br />
&#8230;how to withdraw money from our ATM.<br />
&#8230;how to utilize our ERP system.<br />
&#8230;you get the idea.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope none of the behemoths gets the bright idea of supporting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Having been the victim of these ridiculous patents on methods and business processes, I can tell you that it is an out-and-out anti-competitive tool used by larger corporations to kill off smaller companies who compete againts them. The resources in time and money needed to fight these claims, however much prior art and however obvious these processes are to anyone "skilled in the art", are often well beyond the means of small companies. At best, they are left crippled, before reaching any conclusion. The lawyers get rich and corporations achieve their objective of kill off competition. The sad truth is that the monster was let loose with the ability to patent business methods and since patent offices will accept most patents with little resistance (basic checks excepted) - however invalid they may be - it is left to the courts to decide on their legality. There no appears to be no way of taming said monster in anything but the very long-term (given that most patents will be valid for 25 years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been the victim of these ridiculous patents on methods and business processes, I can tell you that it is an out-and-out anti-competitive tool used by larger corporations to kill off smaller companies who compete againts them. The resources in time and money needed to fight these claims, however much prior art and however obvious these processes are to anyone &#8220;skilled in the art&#8221;, are often well beyond the means of small companies. At best, they are left crippled, before reaching any conclusion. The lawyers get rich and corporations achieve their objective of kill off competition. The sad truth is that the monster was let loose with the ability to patent business methods and since patent offices will accept most patents with little resistance (basic checks excepted) - however invalid they may be - it is left to the courts to decide on their legality. There no appears to be no way of taming said monster in anything but the very long-term (given that most patents will be valid for 25 years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wie gef&#15468;ich die Software Patents !</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/blackboard_patents_the_lms/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Wie gef&#15468;ich die Software Patents !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">277097808#comment-39</guid>
		<description>in FSPA Seite die folgende Nachrichten gelesen:
Patentrecht: Aufruhr im E&#45;Learning&#45;SektorDer E&#45;Learning&#45;Bereich ist in Aufruhr, wie die Posts bei O`Reilly zeigen: Die Firma Blackboard
hat das so genannte Learning Management System (LMS) patentiert und
dam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in FSPA Seite die folgende Nachrichten gelesen:<br />
Patentrecht: Aufruhr im E&#45;Learning&#45;SektorDer E&#45;Learning&#45;Bereich ist in Aufruhr, wie die Posts bei O`Reilly zeigen: Die Firma Blackboard<br />
hat das so genannte Learning Management System (LMS) patentiert und<br />
dam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.693 seconds -->
