Thanks to Al Essa for discovering Blackboard’s latest FAQ on the patent. I am thrilled that they have now put these statements out in public (as opposed to just whispering them in their clients’ ears privately) because it finally gives us an opportunity to address them head-on. The truth is that their claims about the scope of the patent, while literally true, are highly misleading.
I will wait for Al to post his forthcoming debunking of the FAQ before adding my own 2 cents.
Michael Feldstein is the founder of e-Literate who currently works as the Senior Program Manager for MindTap at Cengage Learning. For more information, see his profile page.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Desire2Learn Strikes Back Desire2Learn filed their response to Blackboard’s infringement suit, and they...
- Supreme Court Strikes a Major Blow for Patent Reform This is huge. Today the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in...
- (Almost) Back in the Saddle Again Well, after a week of being crushed in moving boxes,...
- First 35 Claims of Blackboard's Patent Ruled Invalid According to D2L’s patent blog, the judge in the patent...
- Desire2Learn and Blackboard Technology Tutorials for the Patent Case D2L has posted the Flash-based technology tutorials that both sides...
Maybe we should be grateful to Bb for this move to monopolize LMS. It could push many universities to dump the old stye corporate LMS model, which is unfriendly and expensive, and to jump into the Web 2, online, roll your own learning models.
And what would stop Blackboard (or somebody else) from patenting the next thing we do? No, running from this fight would be a big mistake.
I wouldn’t want anyone to step back from the fight. That is what will destroy this corporate strategy to own the Internet (patents, Internet neutrality, DRM, etc.) I am suggesting that the backlash to the Bb move could have the unintended consequence of accelerating the universities’ move away from commericial CMS or LMS.