Details Are Trickling In

The Waterloo Record has some more details (although there’s still a lot we don’t know):

  • Of the $3.1 million awarded to Bb, there were $2.5 million in lost profits and $630,000 in royalties. I don’t understand this yet, but it appears at first blush as though the forward-looking damages (i.e., royalties) might be limited.
  • The jury gave the judge the option of granting Bb an injunction. What this would mean is that D2L could no longer sell its product in the US while the injunction is in force. However, (a) Bb has not yet asked for that injunction, and (b) an analyst quoted in the article claims the judge would be unlikely to shut D2L down like that, especially if an appeal is pending.
  • Speaking of which, a quote by D2L’s CEO John Baker seems to indicate that D2L will appeal, although his statement is general enough that I wouldn’t call it definitive.
  • D2L thinks that they could develop a workaround for (what’s left of) the patent. (Remember, a good chunk of it was ruled invalid.) In other words, even if the patent holds, they think they can avoid infringing on it with minor modifications to their software.
  • At least one of D2L’s major customers (University of Wisconsin) went on record expressing concern that this suit would increase their licensing fees.

I’m still trying to understand what all of this means. I don’t think anybody involved with this has changed their position or reduced their level of concern while this fight has dragged out, so the questions are really about what the legal ramifications are and what the various community members (including but not limited to D2L and BB) will do next.

One thing that is clear, however, is that so far nobody has benefited financially from this. The $3.1 million Bb could receive in settlement probably won’t even cover their legal fees. Their stock is at the same level it was when they initiated the lawsuit and down over 40% from its highs. And obviously D2L has not come out richer either. Blackboard has a net loss of customers and has created tremendous negative press for itself while D2L now has at least one major customer who is willing to go on record saying that they are worried. (We know a lot less about the financial impact on D2L because it’s not a publicly traded company.)

Tell me again how software patent assertion is going reward and enhance innovation in higher education?

Related posts:

3 Responses to “Details Are Trickling In”


  1. 1 Epic Thinking – innovation and quality in e-learning » Blog Archive » Blackboard won Pingback on Feb 25th, 2008 at 10:01 am
  2. 2 Blackboard wins suit against Desire2Learn | ETC@BMC Pingback on Feb 25th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
  3. 3 益学会 > OLDaily 中文版 » Blog Archive » 2008年2月23日:OLDaily特刊-Blackboard专利权案 Pingback on Feb 26th, 2008 at 3:35 am

Leave a Reply




Subscribe through Feedburner

  • Subscribe via Feed Burner

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.