Another gem that we find on yet another “Breaking the Power Law” blog. (Stephen, you’ve opened up a gold mine.) Wrede’s article gives one of the most clear-eyed assessments that I’ve seen of the strengths and weaknesses of weblog discourse.
Here’s a great little excerpt:
Most weblog authors are no professional writers and most weblog visitors are no professional readers as well. Not being a professional reader means, that this reading can’t compensate weak writing skills of authors and potentially could be characterized as a kind of “seeing what one wants to see” (selective perception).
In addition to this comprehension problem unprofessional weblog readers very often are professional web surfers that may practice a reading style that could be called “fast scan reading”.
This will have an impact on the informational cascade problem. (And yes, I really will finish revisions to that article Real Soon Now.)
Possibly Related Posts:
- Weblogs and Communities of Practice Here’s a thoughtful post comparing communities of practice to networks...
- overstated: Weblogs and authority In the Overstated weblog (great name, by the way), Cameron...
- Weblogs Can Harm Business and Political Decision-Making Looks like I’m almost famous. Yahoo! Financial News picked up...
- Evaluating Students' Weblogs Here’s a great post on student blogging from Middlebury College...
- Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs: The Spirit of Paulo Freire in Blo The idea of using Paulo Freire to sniff out why...



