Group Processes (Including Learning Processes) Should Be Wiki'ed

As many of you know, I am a fan of JotSpot. One of the interesting things that came out of my interview with JotSpot co-founders Joe Kraus and Graham Spencer is that they plan to build workflow syntax and functionality into their wiki product. Which brings me to Scott McMullan’s post….Scott makes the following comment about traditional groupware products:

The limitation with these TeamWare products is their strength: they nicely pre-integrate sets of tools that certain teams find very helpful, but if your team can’t or doesn’t care to work within the processes best-served by those tools, you’re out of luck! There’s never been a TeamWare platform that gave most teams immediate value out of the box, but could then be easily programmed to enable self-service, tightly integrated mini-apps for specialized needs (ie., Situated Software).

The point here here is about workflow, not in the grandiose enterprise sense but in the every-day how-do-we-get-things-done sense. It’s about software that affords doing a job in the way that comes naturally to us. That can be fundamentally idiosyncratic for a lot of important and frequent tasks. What’s the best way to brainstorm an idea? Come to a group conclusion? Research a topic as a group? Each group does these things a little differently. And if the tool doesn’t fit the way you tend to do it then your group is probably not going to end up utilizing that tool.

This is just a more general case of the point I made a while back about how, in Blackboard, all the virtual classroom chairs are bolted to the floor. Education is filled with microprocesses–brainstorming, fact-finding, experimenting, etc. And many of these micro-processes are fundamentally idiosyncratic, based on the particular teacher, the particular group of students, the particular content being taught, and the particular raison d’etre of the course. The ability for teachers to edit micro-workflows easily is going to be critical for the development of better online learning platforms.

Michael Feldstein is the founder of e-Literate who currently works as the Senior Program Manager for MindTap at Cengage Learning. For more information, see his profile page.

Possibly Related Posts:

  1. At the Higher Education Users Group Conference Next Week I’ll be going to the Alliance conference, which is run...
  2. Why Apple May Beat Microsoft to Workflow Learning The evolution of workflow learning follows the evolution of workflow...
  3. Distributed Cognition and Workflow Learning Thinking some more about Sam Adkins’ description of the distinction...
  4. Real Workflow Learning (via ActiveGuide) As I wrote in a previous post, one of the...
  5. Notes on the IMS Learning Impact Conference This year’s Learning Impact conference was the best attended that...

About Michael Feldstein

Michael Feldstein is the founder of e-Literate who currently works as the Senior Program Manager for MindTap at Cengage Learning. For more information, see his profile page.
This entry was posted in EPSS, PCD, and Workflow Learning, Tools, Toys, and Technology (Oh my!) and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>