A few of the usual suspects have pointed to this one already, but in case you haven’t seen it yet, Barry Dahl has a fantastic podcast interview up (about 30 minutes) with Michael C. Smith, an intellectual property lawyer in the district where the case was filed and author of EDTexweblog. Both interviewer and interviewee did a terrific job of really illuminating some of the legal nuances.
There is one point that bears revisiting, though. Michael, in answering Barry’s questions about the USPTO re-examination, appeared to assume that the re-exam was ex parte. This is a perfectly reasonable assumption, since ex parte is far more common a challenge type than inter partes. Nevertheless, the D2L/SFLC challenge is actually inter partes (or, to be more specific a weird hybrid of ex parte and inter partes that mostly follows inter partes rules). Some of Michael’s answers would probably be unaffected by this difference, e.g., the likelihood that the USPTO ruling will affect the prior court ruling. But some, like the probability of a successful USPTO challenge, how this challenge fits into a larger litigation strategy, and how the judge might react to the challenge going forward, could. I’d be really interested to hear whether any of Michael’s answers change based on this information.
Michael Feldstein is the founder of e-Literate who currently works as the Senior Program Manager for MindTap at Cengage Learning. For more information, see his profile page.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Blackboard Fails Statistics 101 Blackboard has posted their response to the USPTO ruling. They...
- Is Blackboard's Lawyer Calling D2L's Customers? Here’s an interesting bit from D2L’s patent blog: Clients have...
- Blackboard Inter Partes Determination Published You can find the documentation here. The USPTO found 13...
- Blackboard and Desire2Learn Fight Over Venue for Next Round *Sigh.* At some point I hope the world–and the Blackboard...
- Desire2Learn Responds to the Blackboard Pledge Here’s the meat from the full post: We at Desire2Learn...
