<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeremy Wagstaff&#8217;s LOOSE wire: Blogs And The Suppression Of Dissent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mfeldstein.com/jeremy_wagstaffs_loose_wire_blogs_and_the_suppression_of_dissent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mfeldstein.com/jeremy_wagstaffs_loose_wire_blogs_and_the_suppression_of_dissent/</link>
	<description>What Michael Feldstein Is Learning About Online Learning...Online</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Do blogs actually encourage herd thinking?</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/jeremy_wagstaffs_loose_wire_blogs_and_the_suppression_of_dissent/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Do blogs actually encourage herd thinking?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">764905690#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Michael Feldstein suggests that the tendency of bloggers to link to other bloggers, usually done as a way of crediting them with the idea, tends to smother discussion or debate. This reminds me of a broader debate about the politics of the Internet in academia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Feldstein suggests that the tendency of bloggers to link to other bloggers, usually done as a way of crediting them with the idea, tends to smother discussion or debate. This reminds me of a broader debate about the politics of the Internet in academia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.365 seconds -->
