<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On &quot;Open&quot; Proprietary Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mfeldstein.com/on-open-proprietary-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mfeldstein.com/on-open-proprietary-software/</link>
	<description>What We Are Learning About Online Learning...Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Masson</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/on-open-proprietary-software/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Masson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mfeldstein.com/?p=1233#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>I might add open development/governance? This would include practices that decentralize authority, distributing decision-making outside of the organization to the user community. Essentially the direction for product development would be determined by those that use the products, and the features in those products, rather than by marketing, trends, commercial goals, etc. I would say an example could be Google which using customer interactions with the product to drive further feature/product development rather than traditional research, development and marketing approaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might add open development/governance? This would include practices that decentralize authority, distributing decision-making outside of the organization to the user community. Essentially the direction for product development would be determined by those that use the products, and the features in those products, rather than by marketing, trends, commercial goals, etc. I would say an example could be Google which using customer interactions with the product to drive further feature/product development rather than traditional research, development and marketing approaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu Plourde</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/on-open-proprietary-software/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu Plourde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mfeldstein.com/?p=1233#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Indeed, open is the most overused buzzword of the moment. That&#039;s a nice checklist you came up with here, I hope decision-makers in higher ed are all aware of this and will learn to ask the right questions to their vendors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Indeed, open is the most overused buzzword of the moment. That&#8217;s a nice checklist you came up with here, I hope decision-makers in higher ed are all aware of this and will learn to ask the right questions to their vendors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: mfeldstein.com @ 2012-02-09 03:45:33 by W3 Total Cache -->
