Antero Aunesluoma writes:
There should exist somekind of continuum between “totally public” and “delimited to a single course in LMS”. A continuum that would serve the diverse users needs. And I refer the term “user” to faculty and students, not to educational technologists. The users need to decide themselves their products level of publicity. Whether the product is a blog entry linked to a course or an article written to a Wiki by a group of students. By level of publicity, I mean some kind of general categories friends/group/course/university/universum.
Amen.
Possibly Related Posts:
- In Defense of Walled Gardens I’ve been seeing the phrase “walled garden” a lot in...
- Yahoo! News – Social Issues Surround Social Software (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&ncid=738&e=11&u=/zd/20040625/tc_zd/130244 by way of elearnspace) OK, there’s a lot that’s...
- The Promise and Perils of Social Software My friend Joe Ugoretz has a new article on social...
- Teaching Faculty About Wikipedia (and Social Software in General) I just discovered Jon Udell’s wonderfully archeological screencast about the...
- Google Announces Open(er) Social Software APIs As many have anticipated, Google has announced its OpenSocial platform,...



Pingback: Social Software, the LMS, and Walled Gardens