<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Court Documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/</link>
	<description>What We Are Learning About Online Learning...Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 06:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Farmer</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/#comment-962</guid>
		<description>Dave, Michael and I were concerned about reader interpretation of the withdrawal. Here is an excerpt from my message to Michael late yesterday with the redacted file:

     You and I have both received a request by Matthew Small to withdraw a copy of Blackboard&#039;s Motion for Prejudgment Interest that I provided to you late Friday. Thank you for withdrawing the document.

    The document contained a copy of Supplementary Exhibit 44 that lists Desire2Learn&#039;s customers and contract value--likely, I learned, data proprietary to Desire2Learn. The Exhibit was marked as confidential and intended for attorneys only. However, it was posted as a public document on PACER, the federal courts document site.

    The Supplementary Exhibit was one of several documents included in the Motion. I should have realized this was an error by a clerk in the court or perhaps an attorney and omitted it when I assembled the document.

    However, I thought it had been made public.

    Attached is a redacted copy of the filing as it was available on PACER today that excludes the confidential information.

    I apologize to attorneys for both Blackboard and Desire2Learn for not being more careful in vetting marked documents.

    jim farmer

As you know, e-Literate is not Michael or my &quot;day job.&quot; I am sure Michael would have preferred, late last night, to respond to your concern. I hope this note places my error in context.

jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, Michael and I were concerned about reader interpretation of the withdrawal. Here is an excerpt from my message to Michael late yesterday with the redacted file:</p>
<p>     You and I have both received a request by Matthew Small to withdraw a copy of Blackboard&#8217;s Motion for Prejudgment Interest that I provided to you late Friday. Thank you for withdrawing the document.</p>
<p>    The document contained a copy of Supplementary Exhibit 44 that lists Desire2Learn&#8217;s customers and contract value&#8211;likely, I learned, data proprietary to Desire2Learn. The Exhibit was marked as confidential and intended for attorneys only. However, it was posted as a public document on PACER, the federal courts document site.</p>
<p>    The Supplementary Exhibit was one of several documents included in the Motion. I should have realized this was an error by a clerk in the court or perhaps an attorney and omitted it when I assembled the document.</p>
<p>    However, I thought it had been made public.</p>
<p>    Attached is a redacted copy of the filing as it was available on PACER today that excludes the confidential information.</p>
<p>    I apologize to attorneys for both Blackboard and Desire2Learn for not being more careful in vetting marked documents.</p>
<p>    jim farmer</p>
<p>As you know, e-Literate is not Michael or my &#8220;day job.&#8221; I am sure Michael would have preferred, late last night, to respond to your concern. I hope this note places my error in context.</p>
<p>jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/#comment-961</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not clear on why Blackboard’s motion for prejudgment interest is being removed.  It sounds like it&#039;s a public document.  Did they just say &quot;if we have to go to court to get you to take it down, we won&#039;t win, but we can afford the legal fees better than you can&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not clear on why Blackboard’s motion for prejudgment interest is being removed.  It sounds like it&#8217;s a public document.  Did they just say &#8220;if we have to go to court to get you to take it down, we won&#8217;t win, but we can afford the legal fees better than you can&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 益学会 &#62; OLDaily 中文版 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2008年3月3日： PISA, PODCAST, SNS, BLACKBOARD, MASHUP, MP3 BOOK, CC</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>益学会 &#62; OLDaily 中文版 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2008年3月3日： PISA, PODCAST, SNS, BLACKBOARD, MASHUP, MP3 BOOK, CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mfeldstein.com/some-court-documents/#comment-960</guid>
		<description>[...] 一些法庭文件 一些在Blackboard专利权案例中出现的法庭文件 － 随之是一个古怪的请求（来自Blackboard的律师），要删除一个链接。而这篇作品里链至来源的链接 －instructional media + magic －也已失效了。Feldstein也写到：“回忆起D2L公司曾经发布过一个评论（之后他们应Blackboard律师团的要求撤了下来），他们在审判的要求告知阶段已 经揭露的文件，显示Blackboard公司攻击他们的理由是D2L公司正赢得相当多的交易来对抗Blackboard公司。这份清单明确地是与 Blackboard的主张是一致的”。请同时参阅Jim Farmer与在审判中真相的见证人Fred Hofstetter的会谈。也请参阅Alfred Essa写的伪专利权的剖析。 Michael Feldstein, e-Literate March 3, 2008 [原文链接] [标签: Patents, Copyrights, Blackboard Inc., Patents] [参与评论] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 一些法庭文件 一些在Blackboard专利权案例中出现的法庭文件 － 随之是一个古怪的请求（来自Blackboard的律师），要删除一个链接。而这篇作品里链至来源的链接 －instructional media + magic －也已失效了。Feldstein也写到：“回忆起D2L公司曾经发布过一个评论（之后他们应Blackboard律师团的要求撤了下来），他们在审判的要求告知阶段已 经揭露的文件，显示Blackboard公司攻击他们的理由是D2L公司正赢得相当多的交易来对抗Blackboard公司。这份清单明确地是与 Blackboard的主张是一致的”。请同时参阅Jim Farmer与在审判中真相的见证人Fred Hofstetter的会谈。也请参阅Alfred Essa写的伪专利权的剖析。 Michael Feldstein, e-Literate March 3, 2008 [原文链接] [标签: Patents, Copyrights, Blackboard Inc., Patents] [参与评论] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

