<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Strikes a Major Blow for Patent Reform</title>
	<link>http://mfeldstein.com/supreme-court-strikes-a-major-blow-for-patent-reform/</link>
	<description>What Michael Feldstein Is Learning About Online Learning...Online</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: (le semeur)&#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-05-02</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/supreme-court-strikes-a-major-blow-for-patent-reform/#comment-4126</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 23:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mfeldstein.com/supreme-court-strikes-a-major-blow-for-patent-reform/#comment-4126</guid>
					<description>[...] Supreme Court Strikes a Major Blow for Patent Reform at e-Literate the central issue was the meaning of “obviousness.” The reason that the word is important in patent law is because an innovation that is deemed “obvious” is not patentable. (tags: law patent) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Supreme Court Strikes a Major Blow for Patent Reform at e-Literate the central issue was the meaning of “obviousness.” The reason that the word is important in patent law is because an innovation that is deemed “obvious” is not patentable. (tags: law patent) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: OLDaily[中文版] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007年4月30日</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/supreme-court-strikes-a-major-blow-for-patent-reform/#comment-4077</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 18:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mfeldstein.com/supreme-court-strikes-a-major-blow-for-patent-reform/#comment-4077</guid>
					<description>[...] 非常好的消息。简而言之，美国联邦法院裁决，一个更加宽泛和符合常识的对词语“显而易见”的解释，将被应用在判断一个被提议的专利权是否具备“明显性”上。该裁决可能推翻任何专利权，包括讨厌的Blackboard专利权案件（还有什么能比在线的课程更加“显而易见”呢？）更多关于美国联邦高等法院裁决的消息。Michael Feldstein, e-Literate April 30, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: Patents, Blackboard Inc., Copyrights, Patents, Traditional and Online Courses] [参与评论] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 非常好的消息。简而言之，美国联邦法院裁决，一个更加宽泛和符合常识的对词语“显而易见”的解释，将被应用在判断一个被提议的专利权是否具备“明显性”上。该裁决可能推翻任何专利权，包括讨厌的Blackboard专利权案件（还有什么能比在线的课程更加“显而易见”呢？）更多关于美国联邦高等法院裁决的消息。Michael Feldstein, e-Literate April 30, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: Patents, Blackboard Inc., Copyrights, Patents, Traditional and Online Courses] [参与评论] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gas Pedals and eLearning &#171; News &#38; Notes on eLearning and Technology</title>
		<link>http://mfeldstein.com/supreme-court-strikes-a-major-blow-for-patent-reform/#comment-4071</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mfeldstein.com/supreme-court-strikes-a-major-blow-for-patent-reform/#comment-4071</guid>
					<description>[...] e-Literate - Supreme Court Strikes a Major Blow for Patent Reform Ars Technica - Supreme Court ruling makes &#8220;obvious&#8221; patents harder to defend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] e-Literate - Supreme Court Strikes a Major Blow for Patent Reform Ars Technica - Supreme Court ruling makes &#8220;obvious&#8221; patents harder to defend [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.646 seconds -->
