Disclaimer
The opinions expressed on this site are solely the authors' own and do not represent those of their respective employers unless explicitly noted otherwise.Subscribe
Subscribe via Email
Search
Top posts
Top Rated Posts
Recent Comments
- “MOOC: Preliminary Results” an event @ eMadrid | Mar Pérez-Sanagustín's blog on Emerging Student Patterns in MOOCs: A (Revised) Graphical View
- tom abeles on Getting students useful feedback from machine learning
- Laura Gibbs on Getting students useful feedback from machine learning
- epurser on Getting students useful feedback from machine learning
- do android graders dream of electric comma splices? | digital digs on Six Ways the edX Announcement Gets Automated Essay Grading Wrong
Tag Archives: SAIP
How To Judge Your Vendor’s Support for a Standard
I wasn’t planning on writing this post, but I’ve become aware of several recent conversations that have led me to the conclusion that it would be useful to get this out. For people who adopt software, trying to judge the … Continue reading
Posted in Openness, Tools, Toys, and Technology (Oh my!)
Tagged IMS LIS, Oracle-Corporation, SAIP
5 Comments
Jenzibar Planning to Support IMS Learning Information Services Standard
I mentioned here recently that SunGard has committed to supporting IMS Learning Information Services in their next release, making them the second major SIS provider to do so. (Oracle, my employer, has supported it in Peoplesoft Campus Solutions for about … Continue reading
Posted in Openness
Tagged IMS, LIS, Oracle-Corporation, Peoplesoft Campus Solutions, SAIP, Sungard
4 Comments
IMS Learning Information Services: Enabling Innovation
In my previous posts on this topic, I outlined the mundate yet important core use cases that LIS is intended to address. Now I’d like to start looking at some of the sexier possibilities that the spec enables. In recent guest posts, … Continue reading
Posted in Openness, Tools, Toys, and Technology (Oh my!)
Tagged creepy treehouse, IMS, Inigral, LIS, Oracle-Corporation, PLE, SAIP
4 Comments


