Tag Archives: Scott-Leslie

Taking the Wikipedia Prior Art Effort to the Next Level

By Michael Feldstein | August 2, 2006

The wikipedia prior art effort has been spectacularly successful so far, racking up close to 200 additions and changes in just a few days. I believe this work has significant intrinsic value in addition to its potential legal value. At any rate, I’d love to see us take our game up another notch.
Now that many [...]

Posted in Open Source, Open Content, Open Access | Also tagged , | 1 Comment

How to Grow Standards

By Michael Feldstein | July 4, 2006

Scott Wilson has a terrific response to my recent post calling for “more standards.” To begin with, he articulates one of the underlying issues that I think was bugging Scott Leslie as well. In the abstract, it’s hard to argue against standards. In practice, however, the particular Standards that are Issued from the Official Bodies [...]

Posted in Educational Pattern Languages, LMOS, Tools, Toys, and Technology (Oh my!), Usability and Human Factors | Also tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Why We Need More Standards

By Michael Feldstein | June 28, 2006

I almost missed this post by Scott Leslie expressing his mixed feelings about the standards talk coming out of Alt-i-Labs. Lucky for me, Stephen picked it up in OLDaily. Scott writes:
Part of me really wants some of these developments to come true, to deliver the promised ‘plug and play’ elearning environments described herein, and in [...]

Posted in LMOS, Tools, Toys, and Technology (Oh my!) | Also tagged , , , | 3 Comments

A Conversation About BRR and LMSs

By Michael Feldstein | May 2, 2006

I’ve been meaning to write this up for a couple of weeks now. Ken Udas and I recently had a great conversation with folks from OpenBRR and Edutools/WCET about creating a community and framework to evaluate both Open Source and proprietary LMSs, drawing on the knowledge and resources of both OpenBRR and Edutools. In attendance [...]

Posted in Open Source, Open Content, Open Access | Also tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.