Executive Director Michael Korcuska has posted a response on his blog. In my opinion, it hits all the right notes and is well worth reading in its entirety. I’ll just highlight one particular point Michael makes that I think is particularly important:
One of the main reasons the Sakai project was started in the first place was to provide more choice for the higher education community. We hope that D2L will continue to offer its product in the United States. We do not want to see this verdict result in less competition and fewer choices in the marketplace.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Blackboard's Response to the USPTO Office Action In case you haven’t seen it yet, Blackboard has responded...
- Blackboard's Response to Open Source: Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt Blackboard has not been having a good time in the...
- Analysis of Blackboard Response to Recent Disclosure of Security Vulnerabilities There’s been an interesting set of public relations based on...
- What the Sakai Announcement Means Barry Dahl read the Sakai Foundation’s recent announcement about the...
- Connecting Blackboard to Sakai and Moodle I didn’t intend to post about this, but people keep...




Pingback: The Sakai Foundation’s Response